Comparative Study of Hamka and Quraish Shihab's Interpretation: Application of Gadamer's Hermeneutics in Qs. Al-Maidah [5]: 51

Hamka and Quraish Shihab have a different understanding of the interpretation QS. al-Maidah [51]. interprets this verse as an absolute prohibition making non-Muslims leaders. While not prohibition, so that argues may make leaders with certain conditions. This article will analyze factors causing differences in their interpretations Gadamer's hermeneutic approach. hermeneutics is chosen because for Gadamer result or strongly influenced by author's pre-understanding context. In analyzing interpretation, considers four things, namely Consciousness Influenced History, Pre-understanding, Hermeneutic Circle assimilation Application. After using Hermeneutics theory, it can be concluded are context lives educational backgrounds. lived when political relations Indonesia between Muslims were tense. Meanwhile, politics was no longer heated harmonious. Analysis considering horizon encourages creation objectivity assessing work interpretation. dan memiliki pemahaman yang berbeda mengenai penafsiran menafsirkan ayat ini sebagai larangan mutlak menjadikan non-Muslim pemimpin. Sedangkan bukan mutlak, sehingga berpendapat boleh pemimpin dengan syarat tertentu. Artikel akan menganalisis faktor-faktor penyebab perbedaan mereka pendekatan hermeneutika Gadamer. Hermeneutika dipilih karena bagi hasil atau interpretasi sangat di pengaruhi oleh pra-pemahaman konteks pengarang. Dalam sebuah interpretasi, mempetimbangkan empat hal, yaitu Setelah menggunakan teori dapati disimpulkan bahwa dipengaruhi kehidupn backroug pendidikan berbeda. hidup saat hubungan politik antar Muslim tengah tegang. tidak lagi memanas kehidupan muslin non-muslim sudah harmonis. Analisis mempertimbangkan pengarang mendorong terciptanya objektif dalam menilai karya tafsir.